Why Handwritten Notes Still Matter in the Age of AI Note-Takers
- Andrew J Calvert

- 2 hours ago
- 4 min read
AI note-takers promise perfect recall with clean summaries and beautifully listed action items with minimal effort. For coaches and sales professionals juggling back-to-back conversations, that promise is deeply appealing.
And yet for all that gain something subtle is being lost. Thinking. because the real value of notes was never about capture, it was about what happened to you while you were writing them.
The Seductive Promise of AI Notes
AI note-takers are genuinely useful. They remove the cognitive burden of remembering every detail. They reduce admin time. They even create a searchable archive of conversations that would otherwise blur together.
If something else is listening, summarizing, and prioritizing for you, your role in the conversation subtly shifts. You’re still present, but you’re no longer doing the full work of sensemaking. Outsource your understanding and you'll miss too much.
What Notes Are Actually For
For coaches and sales people, notes are a thinking surface, a tool to reflect as the conversation progresses
Notes help you:
Make meaning while listening
Notice patterns as they emerge
Act as a rapport building tool (looks back through notes, "earlier you said...")
Hold competing interpretations without resolving them too early
Translate conversation into judgment and choice
A good page of notes doesn’t show what was said. It shows what landed and stuck with you.
That distinction matters. Because in high-stakes conversations, discovery calls, coaching sessions and beyond, understanding isn’t something you do later. It’s something you build in real time.
What the Science Actually Says
The research on handwriting and learning isn’t new, but it is becoming clearer and more refined.
First, handwriting forces generative processing.
You simply can’t write everything down by hand. The speed limitation forces you to choose. To summarize. To paraphrase. To decide what matters enough to capture. That act of selection is the mechanism of learning.
When people type, or rely on transcription, they’re far more likely to capture words verbatim. Meaning-making is deferred. Sometimes indefinitely and the brain stays shallow.
Second, handwriting engages the brain differently.
Neuroscience studies using EEG show that handwriting produces broader and more integrated neural activity than typing (i.e. When you write by hand, more of your brain gets involved. You’re not just recording information, you’re actually processing it). The patterns associated with memory formation and conceptual encoding are more active when people write by hand.
In plain terms: handwriting looks more like building a memory, not just storing information.
Third, recall is stronger when understanding is required.
A large meta-analysis published in 2024 found that handwritten notes generally outperform typed notes on learning outcomes, particularly when the task involves comprehension, synthesis, or application. The advantage in handwriting is in the effort.
Finally, recording changes attention.
When people know a complete record exists, they engage differently in the moment. This is known as cognitive offloading. Attention softens because the brain assumes it can “get to it later.” And we all know too often it doesn’t.
Tl/Dr
Slower, effortful encoding leads to deeper learning. Handwriting naturally creates that effort.
Why This Matters More for Coaches and Sales People
Most professions can survive shallow notes. Coaching and sales can’t. These roles depend on:
Interpreting ambiguity
Tracking emotional and relational signals
Understanding power, risk, and decision dynamics
Noticing what’s repeated, avoided, or said sideways
That kind of understanding emerges from interpretation it doesn’t emerge from transcripts.
Handwritten notes support that work because they slow you just enough to think. They invite judgment. They make assumptions visible. They preserve uncertainty rather than smoothing it away.
AI notes, by contrast, are very good at producing clean, confident summaries, even when the situation itself is anything but clean or confident. In complex human conversations, clarity too early is often false clarity.
The False Choice Everyone Is Making
To suggest that this is a choice between handwritten notes or AI notes is lazy. The smarter frame is one of division of labour.
Let humans do what humans are good at:
Interpreting meaning
Making judgments under uncertainty
Noticing emotion, hesitation, and subtext
Deciding what matters
Let the machine do what machines are good at:
Capturing verbatim detail
Producing searchable records
Generating drafts and reminders
In practice, that looks like this:
You don’t handwrite everything. You handwrite meaning. Decisions. Risks. Hypotheses. What you think is really going on. The question you didn’t ask but should have.
You build understanding. The AI stores information.
Practical Use Without Becoming a Purist
For coaches:
Handwrite metaphors, repeated phrases, emotional shifts
Write interpretations, not transcripts
Capture “working hypotheses” you can test later
For sales professionals:
Write beliefs about the deal, not product details
Track decision dynamics and disconfirming signals
Note where confidence feels real and where it doesn’t
For both:
End key meetings with a 60-second recall, without looking back at your notes
Write what you think you learned
Then, if needed, check the AI notes for accuracy or gaps
If it didn’t make it onto the page, assume it didn’t fully land.
Another Risk To Consider
Over-reliance on AI notes doesn’t just change how we record conversations. It changes how we show up to them.
When we outsource listening and remembering, we risk becoming less accountable for our own understanding. The danger is disengaged presence. And in coaching and sales, presence is the product.
A Different Way to Think About It
Handwritten notes are a commitment to thinking while it matters not a rejection of AI.
In a world obsessed with capture, handwriting is an act of attention. In a world of instant summaries, it’s a refusal to skip the work of understanding.
Use the tools. Just don’t give away the part of the job that makes you valuable.
Because the goal was never to remember everything. The goal was to understand enough to choose well.



Comments